Course Content
Validating an isogenic tumor model for PSMA heterogeneity using [68Ga]-Ga-PSMA-11 microPET/CT
0/2
Novel non-steroidal fluorine-18 labeled PET tracer for imaging androgen receptors in a preclinical prostate cancer model
0/2
PET Imaging, Biodistribution and In Vitro Stability Assessment of [134Ce]Ce-RPS-088: A Versatile Surrogate for Non-Invasive Dose Calculation of [225Ac]Ac-RPS-088 in Prostate Cancer?
0/2
Dual-modality nuclear imaging: Development and in vivo evaluation of a novel Sc-44/ Lu chelation platform
0/2
Evaluating Theranostic Targets for Endometrial Carcinoma
0/2
The Deep Learning Radiomics Nomogram Helps to Evaluate the Lymph Node Status in Cervical Adenocarcinoma/Adenosquamous Carcinoma
0/2
Targeted Alpha and Beta Therapy with Sacituzumab-Govitecan: A TROP-2 targeted Theranostic Approach in a High-Grade Serous Ovarian Adenocarcinoma Mouse Model
0/2
Advancements in Prostate and Reproductive Health
About Lesson
Abstract Body:

Background: Targeted alpha therapy with Ac-225 has demonstrated success in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer who have progressed on all other available treatment strategies.a Presently, standardized doses are administered, in part because the low therapeutic activities and the complex decay chain of Ac-225 complicate the calculation of a personalized patient dose.b [134Ce]Ce3+ has chemical and physical properties that match well with [225Ac]Ac3+ and decays by electron capture to positron-emitting La-134 (t1/2 = 6.5 min).c On this basis, we hypothesize that 134Ce-labeled compounds could be used to predict Ac-225 dose by PET imaging. The aim of this study is to assess the suitability of Ce-134 as an imaging surrogate for Ac-225 in a preclinical prostate cancer model.

Methods: RPS-088d was labeled with Ce-134 or Ac-225 in 20min in 0.1M NaOAc, pH 6 at 95 °C. Comparative biodistribution studies (n=4) of 3.1-3.7 MBq [134Ce]Ce-RPS-088 (1.6-2.5 MBq/nmol) and 50 kBq [225Ac]Ac-RPS-088 (0.17-0.32 MBq/nmol) were carried out in LNCaP xenograft mice (n=4) 6h, 23h, and 72h post-injection (p.i.). Prior to euthanasia, 30 min static PET images were acquired. Two additional mice were co-administered 1.6 MBq [134Ce]Ce-RPS-088 and 50 kBq [225Ac]Ac-RPS-088. Tumors, kidneys, livers, and spleens were excised 6h p.i. and sectioned for analysis by digital autoradiography. Four non-tumor bearing nude mice were imaged 2h pre- and post-euthanasia. HPLC-based radiometabolite analysis (n=3) of blood, kidney, and liver homogenates from nude mice was carried out following administration of 3.3 MBq [134Ce]Ce-RPS-088 or 150 kBq [225Ac]Ac-RPS-088. In vitro internalization ratios of 10 nM [134Ce]Ce- or [225Ac]Ac-RPS-088 were studied in LNCaP cells after 2h, 6h and 22h of incubation. Finally, the release of Ce-134 and Ac-225 from [134Ce]Ce- and [225Ac]Ac-RPS-088 incubated in human serum at 37 °C was monitored by radio-TLC (50 mM citrate, pH 5.0) for up to 72h.

Results: The tissue distribution of [134Ce]Ce-RPS-088 and [225Ac]Ac-RPS-088 was comparable in most organs, with the exception of the kidneys, for which uptake and retention of [134Ce]Ce-RPS-088 was lower at all analyzed time points (Figure 1). Differences in tumor accumulation at earlier time points ­– 21.8 ± 2.5 %ID/g (6h) and 29.3 ± 10.7 %ID/g (23h) for [134Ce]Ce-RPS-088; 36.1 ± 8.0 %ID/g (6h) and 36.4 ± 6.3 %ID/g (23h) for [225Ac]Ac-RPS-088 – possibly reflect the heterogeneity of the LNCaP model, but clearance of [134Ce]Ce-RPS-088 from tumors at 72h p.i. was pronounced compared to [225Ac]Ac-RPS-088 (7.0 ± 1.4 %ID/g versus 88.3 ± 19.6 %ID/g, respectively).  Digital autoradiography confirmed equivalent distributions of the two radiopharmaceuticals in tumors, livers, and spleens, but highlighted regional differences within kidneys. Pre- and post-mortem imaging revealed that the liver activity decreased in the 2h delay time between images, suggesting that released and redistributed La-134 may contribute to the uptake. Both compounds were stable for a minimum of 6h in the blood of injected mice, while continuous degradation was observed in the kidneys. Ce-134 was released from [134Ce]Ce-RPS-088 in human serum (1.2 ± 0.7% at 2h, 21.5 ± 4.7% at 24h and 52.4 ± 3.7% at 72h, n=2) more readily than Ac-225 from [225Ac]Ac-RPS-088 (3.3 ± 1.1% at 2h, 9.5 ± 0.4% at 24h and 11.3 ± 0.5% at 72h, n=2). Both compounds showed in vitro internalization ratios between 65% and 80% with a steady increase over time.

Conclusion: With the exception of the kidneys, the in vivo distribution profile of [134Ce]Ce-RPS-088 matches that of [225Ac]Ac-RPS-088 at early time points. Increased release of Ce-134 from [134Ce]Ce-RPS-088 may, however, affect the accuracy of image-based dosimetry calculations at later times. The influence on the calculated tumor and organ doses will be assessed in a next step.

Image/Figure:

Click to view full size

Image/Figure Caption:

Fig 1: Biodistribution study of 3.1-3.7 MBq [134Ce]Ce-RPS-088 and 50 kBq [225Ac]Ac-RPS-088 in selected organs at 6h, 23h, and 72h post-injection using an LNCaP xenograft mouse model. Top, representative PET images of mice injected with [134Ce]Ce-RPS-088 acquired prior to start of the biodistribution study.

Presentation Poster:
Click to View

Author

Anja Simone Wacker
Weill Cornell Medicine
0% Complete